Bohannon & Morrison, Inc. v. Stutz Motor Car Co.

This was an action in replevin by appellant against the appellee to recover the possession of an automobile, in which judgment was rendered, in the court below, in favor of appellee. Appellant filed a motion for new trial setting up as grounds therefor that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law, which motion was overruled. This appeal followed and the error assigned is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for new trial.

Point sixth under rule 21 of the Supreme and Appellate Courts, reads as follows: “The briefs shall contain…