Legal Opinion

Doering v. Walters

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1923No. 11,632PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, P. J.

This was an action by appellee and against the appellant to recover damages for injuries to his automobile, sustained by. reason of a collision between the machines of the appellee and the appellant.

To the complaint, which was in one paragraph, the appellant answered in general denial. He also filed á counter-claim for damages alleged to' have been suffered *195by reason of his machine having been injured in the same collision. The appellant’s counter-claim was met by answer in general denial.

The issues thus formed were submitted to a jury for trial, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . LipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Smith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reuille v. BowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Hickerson v. JosseyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Eberhart v. AbshireCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  4. Bohannon & Morrison, Inc. v. Stutz Motor Car Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API