Legal Opinion
Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-1261PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
This case presents one of many challenges to the contraceptive services mandate of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010). A number of circuits, including the District of Columbia Circuit, have examined the mandate’s requirements regarding contraceptive coverage for employees of for-profit companies; that issue is now pending before the Supreme Court. See Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 723 F.3d 1114, (10th Cir.2013) (en banc), cert. granted, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8418 (U.S. Nov. 26, 2013)…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- University of Notre Dame v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. BurwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Geneva College v. Secretary United States DePartment of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.