Legal Opinion
Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest v. Mullinax
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 11, 1999No. 98-389PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest (Hartford Insurance) appeals a summary-judgment order in favor of appellees Melvin Mullinax and Jim Bottin Enterprises, Inc. (Jim Bottin), on four grounds: (1) error in granting summary judgment to Mullinax for breach of contract; (2) error in denying Hartford Insurance’s motion for summary judgment against Mullinax; (3) error in granting summary judgment to Jim Bottin on-Hartford Insurance’s subrogation claim; and (4) error in denying Hartford Insurance’s motion for summary judgment against Jim Bottin. We agree with Hartford…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Nucor Holding Corp. v. RinkinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Shepherd v. State Auto Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Page v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Direct General Insurance v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State Automobile Insurance Co. v. Michael J. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Books-A-Million, Inc. v. Arkansas Painting & Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Glenn Gunter v. Farmers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- BPS, INC. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Nelson v. Arkansas Rural Medical Practice Loan & Scholarship BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.