Legal Opinion
Ironworkers Local Union No. 68 v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 4, 2008No. Case No. 6:07-cv-5000-0r1-22DABPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
ANNE C. CONWAY, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant AstraZeneca’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) and Defendant Parexel’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18). Plaintiffs filed a consolidated response to both motions (Doc. 28), 1 and Defendant AstraZeneca subsequently filed a reply (Doc. 33). Upon careful consideration of the motions and memoranda, the Court determines that both motions are due to be GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
In this putative class action, various union health and welfare benefit funds 2 and an individual consumer seek redress for economic…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ironworkers Local Union 68 v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Pennsylvania Employee, Benefit Trust Fund v. Zeneca, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- District 1199P Health & Welfare Plan v. Janssen, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- In Re Actimmune Marketing LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Medical Mutual v. Abbvie Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.