Legal Opinion
(PC) Hepner v. County of Tulare
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 15, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00774Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROGER HEPNER, Case No. 1:18-cv-00774-DAD-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT CROSS- 12 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED, WITH LIMITED LEAVE TO 13 Defendants. AMEND 14 __________________________________ (ECF No. 33) 15 NICHOLAS O’NEAL, OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 Cross-Claimant, FOURTEEN DAYS 17 v. 18 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., 19 Cross-Defendants. 20 21 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 Plaintiff Roger Hepner filed this civil rights action, which…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.