Legal Opinion

Flexer v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided August 11, 2008No. GDTC-AA-08-101-TBWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

GUERNSEY, Chief Judge.

The Plaintiff, a table games dealer, has appealed the decision of the Defendant revoking her gaming license. Pursuant to MTC § 3-224, the Court may not “substitute its judgment for that of the Agency as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact,” MTC § 3-224(j), and shall affirm the decision of the Agency:

unless the Court finds that substantial rights of the person appealing have been prejudiced1 because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions or decisions are:(5) Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. State v. ParentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Kochachy v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clute v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API