Legal Opinion
Bender v. Bender
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 18, 1916No. 7198. [fn*]PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error from District Court, Harris County; Chas. E. Ashe, Judge. Suit by W. F. Bender against Bouis Bender, in which Peter Borgstadt intervened and answered. Judgment for defendant and in-tervener in district court on appeal by inter-vener from judgment for plaintiff in county court, aDd plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.
For the purposes of this opinion we make the following statement:
On the 26th day of November, 1913, Mrs. Mary Hafer, under her maiden name, Borg-stadt, and appellant, W. F. Bender, entered into a written contract in words and figures as follows:
“State of Texas, County of Harris.
“This contract of bargain and sale made and entered into by and between Mrs. Mary Borg-stadt, a feme sole, party of the first part, and W. F. Bender, party of the second part, both residents of the city of Houston, Harris county, Tex., witnesseth:
“(1) That the party of the first part'has this day bargained and sold,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simon v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Patterson v. LambCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Salinas v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Holley's v. CurryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Helsley v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Humble Pipe Line Co. v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Bergstedt v. BenderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Ellis v. Michigan Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Griggs v. Jefferson Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- De Walt v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.