Legal Opinion

Bergstedt v. Bender

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1920No. 136-2045PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of First Supreme Judicial District. Suit by W. F. Bender against Douis Bender, in which Peter Bergstedt intervened and answered. A judgment for defendant and in-tervener was reversed and rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals (187 S. W. 735), and the intervener brings error. Judgment - of Court of Civil Appeals reversed, and that of district court affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtSonfiedd, P. J.

On the 26th day of November, 1913, Mrs. Mary Hafer, under her maiden name, Bergstedt, entered into a written contract with W. P. Bender, wherein she agreed to sell and convey to Bender a certain fractional lot in the city of Houston, known as her residence or homestead, upon which she had resided for some 40 years. Under the terms of the contract, Mrs. Hafer was to have the right to occupy the premises without cost to her during her life, such right not to be assigned, nor the premises sublet. She obligated herself to carry insurance on the improvements in the sum of $1,000 until her death,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Redwine v. HudmanTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Curran v. Holyoke Water Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Long v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kress v. SoulesTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Nash v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API