Legal Opinion
Mount v. Pulsepoint, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 27, 2017No. 16-3194-cvPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs Brian Mount and Thomas Nai-man appeal the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of their state-law claims of deceptive business practices, see N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 849 (“§ 349”), and unjust enrichment, both of which stem from defendant PulsePoint, Inc.’s alleged circumvention of web-browser privacy features and its placement of tracking cookies on plaintiffs’ computers in order to gather information about their internet use. PulsePoint defends the dismissal and further reiterates its challenge to plaintiffs’ Article III standing, which the district court had rejected. See…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Patel v. Facebook Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Fischkoff v. Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- McDonald v. ApsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Aponte v. Northeast Radiology, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.