Council v. Department of Public Utility Control
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, the Cox Cable Advisory Council (advisory council), may appeal from the decision of the defendant franchising authority, the department of public utility control (department), granting to the defendant CoxCom Connecticut, Inc., doing business as Cox Communications Connecticut/Manchester (Cox Cable), a renewal of its franchise. The advisory council appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its appeal from the department’s decision to renew Cox Cable’s franchise.1 We determine that federal law pre*58empts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Lewis v. Chelsea G.C.A. Realty Partnership, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Mullin v. Guidant Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Cohen v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, No. 365908 (Jan. 17, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.