Legal Opinion

A. B. Dick Co. v. Milwaukee Office Specialty Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin

Decided October 5, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

SEAMAN, Circuit Judge.

The fact of sale to licensees of the complainant of ink made by the Chamberlain Ink Company for use with the complainant’s stencil printing machines, known as “Rotary Mimeograph,” with knowledge of the inhibition of such use contained in the license under the patents averred in the bill, intending the Chamberlain ink to be so used, and fact of use thereof by the licensees accordingly, are well established by the affidavits on behalf of the complainant; and no substantial dispute appears in the answering affidavits, as I believe. So the only issue is, whether the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. HenryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  2. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1909
  3. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Standard BreweryU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1909
  4. Commercial Acetylene Co. v. Autolux Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API