Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
In Equity. On final hearing-.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIEED, District Judge.
The present action involves primarily an issue of fact with relation to the knowledge, and necessarily resultant intent, with which the defendants attempted to make, and made, .sales of caps for use as corks, upon bottles containing liquids which require hermetical sealing.
The particular form of the cap in question is that of a tin disk, with the edge so bent over and crimped as to form a shallow metallic flange, capable of compression over an annular shoulder upon the lip of the bottle to be closed, and with a thin packing or disk of cork inside of the cap, to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Saxlehner v. EisnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Cortelyou v. Charles E. Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Cortelyou v. Charles Eneu Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. American Neon Light CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Telling v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Indiana Mfg. Co. v. Nichols & Shepard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1910
- Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Diamond Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.