A. B. Dick Co. v. Henry
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
This is a suit in equity for alleged contributory infringement of United States letters patent Nos. 746,931 and 749,983, issued December 15, 1903, and January 19, 1904, respectively, to complainant as assignee of Albert B. Dick.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The patents in suit cover the stencil-duplicating machine known as the “Rotary Mimeograph.” In using this duplicating machine it is necessary to use ink of a peculiar make and composition if good results are to be obtained and the machine made a success. This patented machine was placed on the market in August, 1904. As to this ink the president of the complainant company says:
“The ink used on this type of machine is the result of long and protracted experiments of color-makers and experts employed for this purpose, repeated tests under varying conditions so as to adapt…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- People v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- American Electric Welding Co. v. Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1909
- Hennessy v. Wine Growers' Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1914
- A. B. Dick Co. v. Milwaukee Office Specialty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.