Missouri District Telegraph Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
In an action by Lester B. Rose against the Missouri District Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Union Electric Light & Power Company, he recovered a $50,000 judgment against said defendants for personal injuries. On appeal, the judgment was affirmed for $40,000. [Rose v. Missouri District Telegraph Co., 328 Mo. 1009, 43 S. W. (2d) 562.] We will refer to said companies as the telegraph, telephone and light companies. The .telegraph company was compelled to pay the $40,000, with interest and costs. It sued the telephone and light companies for indemnity. Judgment for…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Charles v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Wiggin v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Beave v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Missouri District Telegraph Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Merz v. Tower Grove Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomlinson-Arkwright Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Central Surety & Insurance v. HintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- Boillot v. Income Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.