Legal Opinion

Central Surety & Insurance v. Hinton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1939PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This is an action to recover reimbursement of cértain payments made by plaintiff on account of alleged liability incurred by it under a certain master' plumber’s bond executed by plaintiff, "as surety, and' by defendant, as principal, to the City of Kansas City. The case was tried before the court, without the aid of a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1137.55, the full amount sued for, and defendant has appealed.

Defendant, as a master plumber, was required by Sections 43-2 and 43-3 of the Building Code of Kansas City, to post with' the city a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Wiggin v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State Ex Rel. Gott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Missouri District Telegraph Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. McDonald v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. LaymanOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Stern v. LaroccaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Federal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Stutz v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API