Phillips Randolph Enterprises, LLC. v. Adler-Weiner Research Chicago, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
Defendants Adler-Weiner Research Chicago, Inc., Adler-Weiner Research Orange County, Inc., Adler-Weiner Research, L.A., Inc., and Scott Weiner (collectively “defendants”) have moved to dismiss plaintiff Phillips Randolph Enterprises, LLC’s (“Phillips”) complaint (“the complaint”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff alleges that on May 31, 2006, defendants transmitted an unsolicited facsimile (“fax”) advertisement in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 (2006). 1…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First Insurance Funding Corporation v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Kenro, Inc. v. Fax Daily, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- John W. Moranski v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Lutz Appellate Services, Inc. v. CurryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by14 opinions
- All American Painting, LLC v. Financial Solutions & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Critchfield Physical Therapy v. Taranto Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Hinman v. M and M Rental Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Bais Yaakov v. Alloy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Neurocare Institute of Central Florida, P.A. v. Healthtap, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.