Legal Opinion

Greenbelt Advocates v. Division of Mineral Resources Management

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2008No. 06-BE-45Published

1Opinion of the Court

Donofrio, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Greenbelt Advocates, appeals the decision of the Reclamation Commission (“Commission”) affirming the decision of the Chief of the Division of Mines and Reclamation (“Chief’) denying the Lands Unsuitable Petition (“LUP”) filed by the Village of Barnesville and the Warren Township Trustees.

{¶ 2} As a preventative measure, areas of land can be designated unsuitable for coal mining because of their important environmental or social value. In Ohio, R.C. 1513.073(A) sets forth two types of lands-unsuitable designations — mandatory and discretionary. A mandatory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Weiss v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Weiss v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API