Legal Opinion
State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 2002No. Nos. 2001-0748 and 2001-0976PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
I. Introduction
{¶ 1} This is a regulatory-takings case. Regulatory-takings issues are complex and difficult and have defied attempts to provide a simple solution. Even the United States Supreme Court “quite simply, has been unable to develop any ‘set formula’ for determining when ‘justice and fairness’ require that economic injuries caused by public action be compensated by the government, rather than remain disproportionately concentrated on a few persons.” Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. New York City (1978), 438 U.S. 104, 124, 98 S.Ct. 2646, 57 L.Ed.2d 631.
*2{¶ 2} R.T.G., Inc. (“RTG”) is a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Clark County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Seven Up Pete Venture v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Kramer v. Angel's Path, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.