Legal Opinion

Goss v. Suburban Motors, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1955No. 29167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE,. Commissioner.

This is an action by the purchaser of a truck against the seller. The seller contracted at the time of the sale to install a dump body on a truck chassis that the. buyer had purchased. The truck was destroyed by a collision before it' was delivered to the buyer and the buyer here sues to recover the value of the truck destroyed. The case originated in the magistrate court and was tried on appeal to the court on an agreed statement of facts. There was a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The, agreed statement of facts is as follows:

“…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sidney Stevens Implement Co. v. HintzeUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ellis Gray Milling Co. v. SheppardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Gilbert v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. United Iron Works v. Standard Brass Casting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Pratt Grain Co. v. SchreiberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Doerflinger Realty Company v. MaserangMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Statler Manufacturing, Inc. v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API