Doerflinger Realty Company v. Maserang
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL A. DEW, Special Commissioner.
Appellants, as plaintiffs in the trial court, sought by this action to recover from respondents $1,475 as a forfeiture under the terms of a contract to purchase certain residence property belonging to appellants Bockrath in St. Louis County, Missouri. The verdict and judgment were in favor of the respondents. Appellants’ motion for judgment in accordance with their motion therefor at the close of the testimony or, ini the alternative, for a new trial, having been; overruled, they have appealed from the judgment.
The petition pleads and is based upon a.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thacker v. Massman Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Swain v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Bogad v. WachterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Ellis Gray Milling Co. v. SheppardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- McClintock v. Skelly Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDermott v. BurpoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Koch-laumand Contracting, Inc. v. May Department Stores Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Suburban Realty Co. v. SturgeonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Bays v. JurschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Richard's Original Long Creek Lodge v. Seymour Inn, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.