Legal Opinion

Corona Foothill Lemon Co. v. Lillibridge

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1937No. L. A. 15308PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The controversy presented by this case concerns the right to underground waters.

The respondents are owners of lands overlying what they claim to be the Corona basin. The appellants, it is charged in the complaint, about the month of July, 1930, began pumping water in large quantities from wells situated on their lands also in the basin, which water they transported through an open ditch into the Santa Ana River and finally to points outside of the basin; that during the summer and fall of 1930 appellants so exported from the basin more than 500 miner’s inches of water per day (the term…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Strong v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Omnes v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Miller v. Citizens Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Trussell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API