Legal Opinion

People v. Paul

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Rothwax, J.

The defendant, Samuel Paul, moves to suppress a .3006 calibre rifle and a .380 calibre pistol which were seized from *1087his apartment pursuant to a search warrant. The defendant claims to have been aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure. (CPL 710.20, subd 1.) He contends that the search warrant was facially invalid in that it was overbroad and, further, that it was issued without the requisite probable cause. (CPL 690.10, subd 3; 690.45, subds 3, 4.)

PROBABLE CAUSE

The search warrant was issued upon the affidavit of Detective August Jonza. Detective…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. State v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  3. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API