Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress because a clause authorizing the search of “any person present” inside the apartment (CPL 690.15 [2]) was improperly included in the warrant, rendering the entire search warrant invalid. County Court found — and the People do not dispute — that probable cause did not exist for such a clause to be included in the search warrant. However, the court determined that the “any person present” provision could be severed from the rest of the warrant and the *1492remainder of the search warrant was otherwise…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. PinkneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. MothersellNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API