Legal Opinion

United States v. Espada

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 2, 2015No. 10-CR-00985-1 (FB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BLOCK, Senior District Judge:

On August 6, 2014, Connie Espada (“Mrs. Espada”) filed a pro se third-party petition pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) in the above-captioned criminal case. In the petition, Mrs. Espada argues that she has an interest in the New York State pension account of her husband Pedro Espada, Jr. (“Mr. Espada”) — which is subject to a preliminary order of forfeiture as a substitute asset of Mr. Espada — because she is listed as a beneficiary under his pension plan. Mrs. Espada further argues that the preliminary order was entered in violation of Mr.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Heriberto Leon, A/K/A "Pupe"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James GormleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Peña-FernándezUnited States District Court · 2019
  2. United States v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API