Legal Opinion

State v. Purcell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

Appellant was charged in the district court, for Blaine county, with a felony, the charging part of the information being:

“That the said Walter Purcell on the 1st day of June, 1923, in the county of Blaine, state of Idaho, then and there being, did wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously then and there live with, and for a long time previous thereto, had been living with, one Madge Barber, she, the said Madge Barber, being then and there a woman of bad repute.”

The cause was tried by the court with a jury and upon a verdict of guilty appellant was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Lewis v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Libby v. PelhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Archbold v. HuntingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Idaho Health Facilities AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Washington Water Power Co. v. Kootenai Environmental AllianceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API