Legal Opinion

State v. Nelson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1923PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Le'E, J.

The city of Rexburg passed an ordinance entitled “An ordinance for the raising of revenue-by levying and collecting a license tax on certain occupations, trades, businesses, vocations and employments transacted, engaged in or carried on within the corporate limits of the city of Rexburg, Madison county, Idaho, etc.” This ordinance, from its terms, is for the purpose of raising revenue and not for the purpose of regulation, for in addition to its title stating that it is for the purpose of raising revenue, section 2 thereof provides that “hereafter the following license tax for the purpose of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Camp SingMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Achenbach v. KincaidIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Johnson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Mankato v. FowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. In re KesslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnson v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API