Legal Opinion

Walton v. McKinney

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1908No. Civil No. 1030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL' from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

— The appellee, P. J. McKinney, brought suit in ejectment in the court below against appellant, William Walton, to recover possession of the property described as the southeast one-quarter and the east one-half of the northeast one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of section 3, township 1 north, range 2 east, Gila and Salt River base and meridian, containing sixty acres of land, together with three-fourths of water right No. 175 in the Grand Canal attached to said land, also a certain lateral ditch and sixty shares in the Appropriators’ Canal Company attached to said land. The appellant,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haffey v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Lee v. KirbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Goldthwait v. LynchUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Riley v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Saldutti v. FlynnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Newmyer v. RoushIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Kresse v. RyersonArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Tovrea v. UmphressCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Walton v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Nelson v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API