Legal Opinion

Walton v. McKinney

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1909No. Civil No. 1030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial' District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. —

For the reasons given in the majority opinion upon the former hearing of this case (11 Ariz. 385, 94 Pac. 1122), the judgment of the district court is reversed, with direction to that court to render judgment that the ap-pellee, P. J. McKinney, within thirty days after the rendition of such judgment, do duly execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the appellant, William Walton, his deed to the premises and property described in the complaint, but without covenants of warranty, on the payment by the said Walton *208to the said McKinney of the sum of $5,500, with interest thereon at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walton v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Nelson v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API