Goldthwait v. Lynch
Utah Supreme Court
Cross-Appeals from a judgment of the district court of the third district and from an order refusing a new trial, Hon. Thomas J. Anderson, judge. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, J.:
This action was commenced by plaintiff to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate, or, if this conld not be had, for damages for breach of contract of sale. The court refused a decree of specific performance, but gave judgment for damages against defendants Lynch and Glassman. Plaintiff appeals from the refusal to grant specific performance. . The defendants Lynch and Glassman appeal from the judgment against them for damages. The defendants Crowther, Kelsey, and Gillespie resist the appeal of plaintiff. The plaintiff resists the appeal of Lynch and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morgan v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Murphy v. . SpauldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Davison v. . Associates of the Jersey CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Norback v. Board of Directors of Church Extension Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
- Leisch v. BaerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Walton v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1908
- Purington v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Weir Investment Co. v. ScattergoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.