Legal Opinion
Marcie Hamilton v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 16, 2021No. 3:20-cv-03710Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARCIE HAMILTON, Case No. 20-cv-03710-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTIONS FOR PAGA SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES 10 JUUL LABS, INC., Docket Nos. 80-81 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Marcie Hamilton and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) Representative 16 Jim Isaacson (“Plaintiff” for simplicity) filed this lawsuit against Hamilton’s former employer, 17 Defendant Juul Labs, Inc. (“Juul”), seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief related to alleged 18 policies,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.