Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Dickey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8270PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Newcomb, C.

Edgar Henderson, as assignee of J. M. and Gr. M. Overshimer, sued the appellee upon a promissory note for $300. During the progress of the cause the note was assigned by Henderson to James M. Overshimer, and an agreement was entered of record that the proceédings should be continued in the name of Henderson, for the benefit of his assignee.

The defendant answered: 1. A general denial; 2. That, at the time of the execution of the note, the defendant was a person of unsound mind ; 3. That the note was given without any consideration; and a 4th answer as follows :

“And, for a fourth and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Parker v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Stropes v. Board of Comm'rsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API