Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Ford Motor Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 990155PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ford Motor Company appealed from a February 8, 1999, order awarding Barbara Steiner summary judgment on her tort claims against Ford for damages incurred when her 1993 Mercury Sable was destroyed by a fire. Ford also appealed from a March 8, 1999, order denying Ford’s motion for summary judgment dismissal of Steiner’s tort and warranty claims, and from a judgment, entered April 1, 1999, awarding Steiner $10,900 plus interest. We hold Steiner’s tort claims are barred, as a matter of law, by the economic loss doctrine. We, therefore, reverse the judgment, the order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. North Dakota Department of Human Services v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hagert v. Hatton Commodities, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fleck v. Jacques Seed Co., Prescott, WisconsinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Cooperative Power Association v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Leno v. K & L Homes, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Ziegelmann v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re StarLink Corn Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  4. Dj Coleman, Inc. v. Nufarm Americas, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
  5. Arena Holdings Charitable, LLC v. Harman Professional, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API