Legal Opinion

Tischner v. Rutledge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1904No. 4942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Meal, J., entered July 23, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Per curiam

This is an action of unlawful detainer. The facts are not in dispute and are substantially these: On April 9, 1900, the respondent, being the owner of a store building and the lands on which the same was situate in the city of Davenport, in this state, leased the same to the defendant, Anderson, at a rental of $33.33 per month, payable monthly, for a term terminating on the 8th day of April, 1901, “with the privilege at the same rate and terms each year thereafter from year to year.” Anderson held under the lease until September 30, 1902, when he transferred his interests in the premises to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Mortgage and Trust Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Downs v. Board of Directors of School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Geyer v. LietzanIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Lattimore v. Fisher's Food Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Moore v. Dresden Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API