Legal Opinion

Petillo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1987No. Appeal, No. 1102 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Daniel Petillo (Petitioner) petitions for review of an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referees dismissal of his claim petition for compensation The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act).1

On October 13, 1976, Petitioner filed a claim petition which alleged partial disability resulting from asbestosis, contracted while in the employ of B.P. Oil Corporation (Employer). A referee found that, although Petitioner was suffering from asbestosis, Petitioner was not disabled and therefore not entitled to compensation. Petitioner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Hines v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Shemanski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mauger & Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Superior Tube Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API