Legal Opinion

Fotomat Corp. v. Photo Drive-Thru, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 20, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-0203PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERRY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Fotomat Corporation (hereinafter “Fotomat”) instituted this suit against defendants Photo Drive-Thru, Inc. and Thomas D. Baldi (an officer of Photo Drive-Thru), alleging infringement of Fotomat’s registered service marks in violation of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., and the New Jersey Trademark Act, N.J.S.A. 56:3-13.1 et seq., as well as violations of Fotomat’s rights under the common law of trademarks and unfair competition.

Plaintiff Fotomat’s motion for a preliminary injunction is presently before the Court.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  3. Estate of Presley v. RussenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  4. Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. National Football League Properties, Inc. v. New Jersey Giants, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API