Legal Opinion
State v. Kuespert
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 15, 1980No. 1-480A83PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The state appeals from an award of attorney fees to plaintiffs pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 37(B)(2)(c) for evasive, incomplete, and inadequate responses to discovery. We affirm.
FACTS
The underlying facts of this case have been reported at Kuespert v. State, (1978) Ind.App., 378 N.E.2d 888 at 889-92, trans. den. Upon reversal and remand by this court, a class action was certified, and plaintiffs pursued discovery, filing a motion to require the state to supplement and answer interrogatories, a request for admissions, and a request for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- McDaniel v. McDanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
- American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gibson v. FleishbeinIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Noble County v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Lucas v. Dorsey Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of Indianapolis v. H.L.C. Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.