Hatfield v. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiffs-Appellants Daniel, Patricia and Courtney Marie Hatfield (hereinafter “Hatfield”) appeal from the denial of their motion for relief from judgment following the trial court’s involuntary dismissal of their complaint filed against Defendant-Appellee Edward J. DeBartolo Corporation d/b/a University Park Mall (hereinafter “DeBartolo”).
We affirm.
ISSUES
We rephrase the issues raised by Hatfield as follows:
1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing Hatfield’s complaint with prejudice as a discovery sanction.
2. Whether the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Rumfelt v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Claywell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Fulton v. Van SlykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Small v. Centocor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Miller v. Junior Achievement of Central Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Brown v. KatzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Chapo v. Jefferson County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.