Legal Opinion
Kumar v. Bay Bridge, LLC
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2009No. 45A03-0803-CV-91PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Bay Bridge LLC ("Bay Bridge") filed a complaint in Lake Superior Court to quiet title to a parcel of real estate commonly known as 149th and Colfax, Cedar Lake, Indiana ("the real estate") and named Atul Kumar (Kumar") as a defendant. Kumar had purchased the real estate at a tax sale but failed to record his deed. The trial court granted Bay Bridge's motion for summary judgment. Kumar appeals and raises several issues. However, we address only the following dispositive issue: whether Bay Bridge was a bona fide purchaser of the real estate at issue. 1 We affirm.
Facts and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of New York v. NallyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Packard v. ShoopmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Keybank National Ass'n v. NBD BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pond v. McNellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Szakaly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Altevogt v. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Marks v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Crown Coin Meter Co. v. PARK P, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Thomas v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hochstetler Living Trust v. Friends of the Pumpkinvine Nature Trail, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.