Legal Opinion

Mills v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 2016No. C072644PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, Acting P.J.—

Defendant insurance company denied uninsured motorist coverage to a third party beneficiary injured in an automobile accident because it had cancelled the policy before the accident occurred. The third party sued, and the insurer sought summary judgment. The third party opposed, contending the cancellation was invalid because a written notice seeking information sent by the insurer to the insureds prior to cancellation was unreasonable as a matter of law, and disputed facts existed as to whether the insurer had mailed the notice of cancellation and actually…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. MacKey v. Bristol West Insurance Service of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Starzynski v. Capital Public Radio, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Ameriprise Financial CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API