Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Spriggs

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 22, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Orphans’ Court of Anne Arundel County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

■There is no dispute about the material facts in this case. ■James Spriggs, of Anne Arundel County, on the 25th of *379July, 1865, duly executed his will. By that will he disposed of all the property, real and personal, which lie then owned. James Spriggs, at the time of the execution of the said will, had a wife, Euth Spriggs, then living, and several children by her also living: — By his said will he devised all his property to said wife and children. His wife Euth died in 1871, and said James soon after the death of said Euth, about 1874, intermarried with Maggie E. Vane, and also had by her…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baacke v. BaackeNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Redwood v. HowisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  3. Glascott v. BraggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Pascucci v. AlsopCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  5. Roane v. HollingsheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API