Legal Opinion

Roane v. Hollingshead

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore City. The ease is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, J.

On the ninth of December, 1889, Rachael Hollingshead, then being a feme sole, made and executed her last *370will and testament in due form of law, and on the twelfth of August, 1891, she married Louis E. Roane. On May the thirteenth, 1892, she died. Her will was propounded for probate in the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore City, and a caveat was thereupon filed by her surviving husband, wherein he claimed that the marriage had operated to revoke the will previously made. The single question involved, then, is, whether the marriage of a woman revokes a will made by her whilst she was single; and this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Will of TullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Will of WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Noyes v. SouthworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Baldwin v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Naab v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In re Estate of ComassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hoy v. HoyMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  4. In Re Walters' EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Redwood v. HowisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API