Baacke v. Baacke
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J. References: Boudinot v. Bradford, 2 Yeates [Pa.], 170;. Eyster v. Young, 3 Yeates [Pa.], 511; Sneed v. Ewing, 22 Am. Dec. [Ky.], 52; Wilson v. Foslcet, 39 Am. Dec. [Mass.],. 736; Negus v. Negus, 26 Am. Rep. [Ia.], 157; Graves v.. Sheldon, 15 Am. Dec. [Vt.], 660; Young’s Appeal, 80 Am. Dec. [Pa.], 518; Yanorsdall v. Van Deventer, 51 Barb. [N. Y.], 147; Heard v. Horton, 1 Den. [N. Y.], 165.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
Carl Baacke, of Lancaster county, on the 16th day of December, 1887, executed a will which disposes of his property in the language following:
“1. After my decease, and after all my debts and funeral expenses have been paid out of my estate, the following heirs shall divide my estate as prescribed in paragraph 2:
■“2. My present wife, Dorothea E. Baacke, shall receive as her share, first, such part as may be allowed her by court and law as my wife; secondly, she, Dorothea E. Baacke, shall receive out of my estate twenty-five dollars in cash, in addition. To my son, Fritz Baacke, I bequeath ten…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re the Will of TullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Corker v. CorkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Graham v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Ellis v. DardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Will of WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bose v. KnutzenNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Battis v. MontabaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Donaldson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Estate of Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- In Re Estate of McClowNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.