Juntunen v. Quincy Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Houghton; O’Brien, J. Case by Emil Juntunen against the Quincy Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, C. J.
The plaintiff, a native of Finland, was injured in defendant’s mines through the fall of a piece of rock. The injury sustained was a broken *343leg. Plaintiff had resided in this country about 11 years and had worked for the defendant in various capacities practically all the time. For more than a year and a half prior to his injury he had worked in a repair crew in charge of one Savinini. The record discloses that shaft No. 2 had for a very considerable distance been crushed in and rendered useless. It became the duty of the repair crew, of which plaintiff was a member, to take out the old…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Petaja v. Aurora Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. KnopfMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Andrews v. Tamarack Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kangas v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Vrelenich v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Aho v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Drajicevic v. Champion Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916