People v. Knopf
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Hillsdale; Lane, J. George Knopf and Fred Knopf were convicted of violating the local option law.
1Opinion of the CourtG-bant, J.
The conviction in this case should be affirmed. It falls directly within the rule of People v. Berry, 107 Mich. 256. The fixtures,- surroundings, and furniture were such as all know are found in the ordinary saloon, and are never the accompaniments of a drug store. The statement in the record is that—
“The people gave evidence tending to prove that the defendants sold intoxicating liquors as a beverage, and kept a saloon and place where intoxicating liquors, namely, lager beer and whisky, were kept for sale as a beverage, as alleged in the information, to such persons as applied for them, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by27 opinions
- Holland v. Durham Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Scendar v. Winona Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Oleson v. Maple Grove Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Wahlquist v. Maple Grove Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Aphoresmenos v. McIntoshMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.