Legal Opinion

People v. Knopf

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1896PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Hillsdale; Lane, J. George Knopf and Fred Knopf were convicted of violating the local option law.

1Opinion of the CourtG-bant, J.

The conviction in this case should be affirmed. It falls directly within the rule of People v. Berry, 107 Mich. 256. The fixtures,- surroundings, and furniture were such as all know are found in the ordinary saloon, and are never the accompaniments of a drug store. The statement in the record is that—

“The people gave evidence tending to prove that the defendants sold intoxicating liquors as a beverage, and kept a saloon and place where intoxicating liquors, namely, lager beer and whisky, were kept for sale as a beverage, as alleged in the information, to such persons as applied for them, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Holland v. Durham Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Scendar v. Winona Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Oleson v. Maple Grove Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Wahlquist v. Maple Grove Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Aphoresmenos v. McIntoshMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API