Andrews v. Tamarack Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Houghton; Cooper, J. Case by Grace E. Andrews, as administratrix of the estate of Nicholas J. Andrews, deceased, against the Tamarack Mining Company for the unlawful killing of plaintiff’s intestate. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.
Plaintiff, as representative of her deceased husband, recovered the present judgment in this case against defendant for injuries resulting in his death, charged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant.
This case was first before this court in the April term, 1897, where a former judgment in favor of plaintiff was reversed by a majority opinion and a new trial ordered. No further prosecution of the case was had until October, 1912, when a second trial occurred, which resulted in the judgment now before this court for review.
For an extended statement of facts in the case, reference is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Petaja v. Aurora Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. KnopfMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Andrews v. Tamarack Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Juntunen v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Mace v. Carolina Mineral Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Stone v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- MacE v. . Mineral Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Kangas v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.