Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 27, 1983No. 505-81LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPECTOR, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff insurance carrier is subrogated to the claim of its insured, Nordstrom Oil Company, the owner and operator of an oil tank facility at Onancock, Virginia. The claim arises out of section 1321(i)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act1 which provides in pertinent part that:

In any case where an owner or operator of a vessel or an onshore facility or an offshore facility from which oil or a hazardous substance is discharged in viola*759tion of subsection (b)(3) of this section acts to remove such oil or substance in accordance with regulations promulgated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quarles Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Union Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. City of PawtucketUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Proctor Wholesale Co.United States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Maryland Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1986
  2. Sunshine Jr. Stores, Inc. v. STATE, DERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Total Petroleum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API