Legal Opinion
City of Pawtucket
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 30, 1976No. 304—75PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Water Quality Improvement Act; oil-spül clecm-up costs. — On September 30, 1976 the court entered the following order:
Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, KitNzig and BeN-Nett, Judges. .; . .
“The City of Pawtucket (City) seeks reimbursement for clean-up expenses it incurred combatting an nil .spill from two city-owned storage tanks. The City relies on Section 11 *325(i) (1) of- tlie Water Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 33 U.S.C. -§ÍS21(i) (1) (1970) (Supp. Y, 1975), which states:
Recovery of removal costs(i) (1) In. any case where an owner or operator of a vessel or an onshore facility or an offshore…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Ramona Freeman, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1973
- Dorothy Healey v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Metromedia, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Ira S. Bushey & Sons, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Maryland Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1986
- Reliance Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Union Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Proctor Wholesale Co.United States Court of Claims · 1978
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.