Legal Opinion

Proctor Wholesale Co.

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 3, 1978No. 398-76PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Proctor Wholesale Company sues to recover, under Section 311(i)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(i)(1) (Supp. V, 1975), its costs of removing spilled oil from United States waters. Both the plaintiff and the United States have moved for summary judgment and the case, which has been argued orally, is ready for disposition.
*1050"The facts are these: On October 12 or 13, 1975, about 4,000 gallons of asphalt conditioner were discharged from an oil storage tank (a converted railroad tank car) located on property owned by plaintiff which had been purchased from the City…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rolls-Royce Limited, Derby, England, a British Company v. The United States and United Aircraft Corporation, Defendant-IntervenorUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. City of PawtucketUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Union Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API