Roulette v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.
The first step to wisdom is calling a thing by its right name. Whoever named “parkways” and “driveways” never got to step two; whoever named “sidewalks” did.
Seeing the wisdom of preserving the sidewalk as an area for walking along the side of the road, the City of Seattle passed an ordinance generally prohibiting people from sitting or lying on public sidewalks in certain commercial areas between seven in the morning and nine in the evening. SMC §§ 15.48.040.1 The ordinance doesn’t restrict sitting or lying in public parks, private or public plazas, or alleys,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Pinard v. Clatskanie School District 6JCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark Paris, American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark ParisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.